"Paul Ong, an economics professor and director of UCLA’s Center for Neighborhood Knowledge, says there are more democratic forms of landownership, like community land trusts, which don’t exist to make a profit. Benefit corporations like Nico might set out to do good, he says, but 'in our market economy there are incentives and pressures to mold behavior around maximizing profit to the degree that your noble ideas become secondary.'
On the other hand, if you’re profit-driven alone, Nico’s holdings may ultimately be too small to make any significant returns for investors, says Eric Sussman, an adjunct accounting professor at UCLA and partner at Clear Capital LLC.
'I’ve never seen a real estate investment trust own so few properties,' he says. 'If this whole approach is to allow renters to get a piece of the action or somehow invest in their own units, I think there are less expensive, more liquid, better ways to go about doing it.'"
[CLA: 6/4/2020]
Recent Comments